A Yerevan court has ruled to maintain custody for a defendant in the “Holy Struggle” case, extending the detention measure for an additional three months. The presiding judge determined that less restrictive measures would pose a risk of interference with the ongoing judicial proceedings.
The decision came during a hearing where the court examined whether alternative preventive measures could adequately ensure the proper course of the investigation. Judicial authorities concluded that only continued detention could guarantee the defendant’s participation in future legal proceedings and prevent potential obstruction of justice.
The extension follows standard legal procedures for cases where courts determine defendants might otherwise avoid judicial oversight or influence the investigation. The three-month detention period allows investigators to continue their work while maintaining the defendant’s presence for required court appearances.
Legal observers note that such extensions are common in complex cases where courts perceive flight risk or potential evidence tampering. The judicial system typically reviews detention measures at regular intervals to balance investigative needs with defendants’ rights.
