A recent address by Armenia’s Prime Minister at the United Nations General Assembly has sparked controversy, with critics pointing to what they call deliberate omissions and damaging admissions regarding relations with Azerbaijan.
During his speech, the Armenian leader reportedly avoided using the term “captive” when referring to individuals held in connection with the long-standing conflict, instead describing them as “persons in prison.” Opponents argue this phrasing downplays Azerbaijan’s continued detention of Armenian prisoners of war and aligns with Baku’s narrative.
In the same appearance, the Prime Minister appeared to acknowledge the failure of previously negotiated frameworks, citing Azerbaijan’s renewed reference to the “Zangezur corridor” as being perceived in Armenia as a territorial claim. Critics say this amounts to a public admission that key agreements have collapsed.
Meanwhile, Azerbaijan’s President used his platform at the UN to level accusations of “aggression” and “war crimes” against Armenian officials, while asserting that Baku authored the terms of recent bilateral agreements.
The developments have raised sharp questions about the viability of the current peace process. With the Armenian leader himself pointing to a lack of mutual understanding and respect, and with Azerbaijan maintaining a confrontational tone, observers are questioning how a lasting settlement can be achieved under these conditions.
